4.7 Article

Business, model innovation in electricity supply markets: The role of complex value in the United Kingdom

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 286-298

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.019

Keywords

Local electricity supply; Business models; System Regulation; Market innovation

Funding

  1. RCUK grant centres with equal weight
  2. Economic and Social Sciences Research Council (ESRC) [EP/K012398/1]
  3. EPSRC 'Realising Transition Pathways Whole Systems Analysis for a UK More Electric Low Carbon Energy Future' project [EP/K005316/1]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K005316/1, EP/K012398/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/K012398/1, EP/K005316/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research investigates the new opportunities that business model innovations are creating in electricity supply markets at the sub-national scale. These local supply business models can offer significant benefits to the electricity system, but also generate economic, social, and environmental values that are not well accounted for in current policy or regulation. This paper uses the UK electricity supply market to investigate new business models which rely on more complex value propositions than the incumbent utility model. Nine archetypal local supply business models are identified and their value propositions, value capture methods, and barriers to market entry are analysed. This analysis defines 'complex value' as a key concept in understanding business model innovation in the energy sector. The process of complex value identification poses a challenge to energy researchers, commercial firms and policy makers in liberalised markets; to investigate the opportunities for system efficiency and diverse outcomes that new supplier business models can offer to the electricity system. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available