4.6 Letter

The possible threat of faking Covid-19 diagnostic tests and vaccination certifications: a call to an immediate action

Journal

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages E340-E341

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab054

Keywords

Covid-19 diagnostic tests; fraudulence; social responsibility; vaccination certification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pandemic caused a regressive effect on the global economy, leading to a 'de-globalized' process that has negatively impacted industries reliant on tourism, urban passenger transport services, and civil aviation. Urgent measures are needed to support vulnerable industries that are not resilient to the pandemic in order to aid economic recovery. The issue of falsifying Covid-19 diagnostic testing certification poses a significant problem in terms of ethics and economics, especially with the start of vaccination programs against Covid-19. This paper argues that collective efforts from everyone could lead to a new normal world that is immune to viruses and unethical behaviors.
The pandemic's recessive effect on the global economy created a 'de-globalized' process that detrimentally causes financial turmoil to countries whose economy depends on tourism, urban passenger transport services and civil aviation, among others. The need to help the most vulnerable industries non-resilient to the pandemic reopen to aid economic recovery amid the pandemic's threat is a very urgent concern. With the move to start the vaccination program against the threat of Covid-19, faking Covid-19 diagnostic testing certification pose a severe problem to matters of ethics and economics. If not taken seriously, falsifying documents that certify a person who has undergone Covid-19 vaccination could also happen. This paper argues that everyone's collective effort could be the real embodiment of hope toward a new normal world immune from the virus and malpractices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available