4.3 Review

Primary pulmonary vein stenosis during infancy: state of the art review

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 7, Pages 1528-1539

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-01008-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ohio Perinatal Research Network within the Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the US National Institutes of Health [R01HL145032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary pulmonary vein stenosis (PPVS) is an emerging issue among infants, with developing understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Multidisciplinary teams are essential for reviewing evidence and providing a common framework for diagnosis and treatment. Institutional and multi-institutional collaboration is crucial to generate specific knowledge and advance research on this rare disease.
Primary pulmonary vein stenosis (PPVS) is an emerging problem among infants. In contrast to acquired disease, PPVS is the development of stenosis in the absence of preceding intervention. While optimal care approaches remain poorly characterized, over the past decade, understanding of potential pathophysiological mechanisms and development of novel therapeutic strategies are increasing. A multidisciplinary team of health care providers was assembled to review the available evidence and provide a common framework for the diagnosis, management, and treatment of PPVS during infancy. To address knowledge gaps, institutional and multi-institutional approaches must be employed to generate knowledge specific to ex-premature infants with PPVS. Within individual institutions, creation of a team comprised of dedicated health care providers from diverse backgrounds is critical to accelerate clinical learning and provide care for infants with PPVS. Multi-institutional collaborations, such as the PVS Network, provide the infrastructure and statistical power to advance knowledge for this rare disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available