4.5 Article

A Stakeholder-Driven Qualitative Study to Define High Quality End-of-Life Care for Children With Cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages 492-502

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.01.134

Keywords

End-of-life; quality; cancer; children

Funding

  1. Robert E. Leet and Clara Guthrie Patterson Trust
  2. CTSA Grant from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [UL1 TR001863]
  3. NIH roadmap for Medical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stakeholders in childhood cancer care prioritize direct communication with children, interdisciplinary care, symptom management, and honoring family preference for location of death. Access to emergency department or hospital for supportive care is valued by many, but most wish to avoid mechanical ventilation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Context. Among adults with cancer, measures for high quality end-of-life care (EOLC) include avoidance of hospitalizations near end of life. For children with cancer, no measures exist to evaluate or improve EOLC, and adult quality measures may not apply. Objective. We engaged key stakeholders to explore EOLC priorities for children with cancer and their families, and to examine relevance of existing adult EOLC quality measures for children with cancer. Methods. In a multicenter qualitative study, we conducted interviews and focus groups with: adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with advanced cancer, parents of children with advanced cancer, bereaved parents, and interdisciplinary healthcare professionals. We transcribed, coded, and employed thematic analysis to summarize findings. Results. We enrolled 54 stakeholders (25 parents [including 12 bereaved parents], 10 AYAs, and 19 healthcare professionals). Participants uniformly prioritized direct communication with children about preferences and prognosis, interdisciplinary care, symptom management, and honoring family preference for location of death. Many participants valued access to the emergency department or hospital for symptom management or supportive care, which diverges from measures for high quality EOLC in adults. Most wished to avoid mechanical ventilation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Notably, participants generally valued hospice; however, few understood hospice care or had utilized its services. Conclusion. Childhood cancer stakeholders define high quality EOLC primarily through person-centered measures, characterizing half of existing adult-focused measures as limited in relevance to children. Future research should focus on developing techniques for person-centered quality measurement to capture attributes of greatest importance to children with cancer and their families. (C) 2021 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available