4.3 Article

Obesity as a Predictor of Outcomes in Type III and Type IV Supracondylar Humerus Fractures

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
Volume 35, Issue 11, Pages E418-E422

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002081

Keywords

obesity; supracondylar humerus fracture; nerve palsy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that obese children with completely displaced supracondylar humerus fractures have a higher risk of Gartland type IV fractures and preoperative nerve palsy compared to normal weight children. However, there were no significant differences between the obese and non-obese groups in terms of open reduction, compartment syndrome, and reoperation rates.
Objectives: To investigate the association of obesity with fracture characteristics and outcomes of operatively treated pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. Design: Retrospective multicenter. Setting: Two Level I pediatric hospitals. Patients: Patients (age <18 years) with operatively treated Gartland type III and type IV fractures 2010-2014. Intervention: Closed or open reduction and percutaneous pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures. Main Outcome Measure: Incidence of Gartland IV fracture, preoperative nerve palsy, open reduction and complication rates. Results: Patients in the obese group had a significantly higher likelihood of having a Gartland IV fracture (not obese: 17%; obese: 35%; P = 0.007). There was a significantly higher incidence of nerve palsy on presentation in the obese group (not obese: 20%; obese: 33%; P = 0.03). No significant differences were found between groups regarding incidence of open reduction, compartment syndrome, and rates of reoperation. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that obese children with a completely displaced supracondylar humerus fractures have an increased risk of Gartland type IV and preoperative nerve palsy compared with normal weight children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available