4.5 Article

Robust Necessary Optimality Conditions for Nondifferentiable Complex Fractional Programming with Uncertain Data

Journal

JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
Volume 189, Issue 1, Pages 221-243

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-021-01829-8

Keywords

Robust necessary optimality conditions; Uncertain complex fractional programming; Robust counterpart; Robust constraint qualification

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XDJK2020B048]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [12071379, 11771058, 11871383, 61673006]
  3. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [2019CFA088]
  4. KFUPM [SB191054]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies robust necessary optimality conditions for a nondifferentiable complex fractional programming with uncertain data, introducing a robust counterpart and the concept of a robust optimal solution. An equivalence between the optimal solutions of the robust counterpart and a minimax nonfractional parametric programming is given, and Fritz John-type and Karush-Kuhn-Tucker-type robust necessary optimality conditions are established under suitable conditions.
In this paper, we study robust necessary optimality conditions for a nondifferentiable complex fractional programming with uncertain data. A robust counterpart of uncertain complex fractional programming is introduced in the worst-case scenario. The concept of robust optimal solution of the uncertain complex fractional programming is introduced by using robust counterpart. We give an equivalence between the optimal solutions of the robust counterpart and a minimax nonfractional parametric programming. Finally, Fritz John-type and Karush-Kuhn-Tucker-type robust necessary optimality conditions of the uncertain complex fractional programming are established under some suitable conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available