4.3 Review

Major cerebral vessels involvement in patients with MELAS syndrome: Worth a scan? A systematic review

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages 359-366

Publisher

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2021.02.002

Keywords

MELAS; Magnetic resonance angiography; Magnetic resonance imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The majority of MELAS patients exhibit alterations in major vessel caliber, with 37% experiencing dilation during stroke-like episodes, and 24% having issues with stenosis. Identification of intracranial vessels dilation or stenosis during a stroke-like episode could be useful for selecting new treatment protocols. Recognition of major cerebral vessels dissections and degenerative changes outside of stroke-like episodes may assist in preventing subsequent complications.
Major cerebral vessels have been proposed as a target of defective mitochondrial metabolism in patients with mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes syndrome (MELAS). Cerebral angiographic techniques are not routinely performed in MELAS patients. A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies describing major vessel caliber alterations in MELAS. Twenty-three studies reporting on 46 MELAS patients were included. Alterations in major caliber vessels were present in 59% (27/46) of patients. Dilation occurred in 37% (17/46) of patients, and in 88% (15/17) of them during a stroke-like episode (SLE). Stenosis was reported in 24% (11/46) of patients: 36% (4/11) related to an SLE and 64% (7/11) to dissections or degenerative changes. During an SLE, identification of intracranial vessels dilation or stenosis could be a selection tool for new treatment protocols. Outside SLE, identification of major cerebral vessels dissections and degenerative changes may help to prevent subsequent complications. (c) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available