4.7 Article

Thermodynamic analysis of CO2 capture by calcium looping process driven by coal and concentrated solar power

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages 251-263

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.022

Keywords

Post-combustion CO2 capture; Ca-looping CO2 capture process; Coal-fired power plant; Solar energy

Funding

  1. National Major Fundamental Research Program of China [2015CB251505]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. Program for 863 Project [2012AA050604]
  4. 111Project [B12034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon capture for coal-fired power plant draws an increasing attention, due to CO2 emissions may have an impact on global climate change. Retrofitting existing power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture using solvent process is one of the most mature carbon capture technologies. However, a significant thermal efficiency drop was observed when integrating coal-fired power plant with post-combustion carbon capture process. Therefore, in this paper, solar energy was introduced to the CO2 capture process, in order to recover the energy of the capture system. Coal-fired power plant with solar aided CO2 capture system ((solar + CC) + PP) and solar aided coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture system ((solar + PP) + CC) were simulated by EBSILON professional and Aspen Plus. Then, energy input, heat recovery, energy penalty and some important evaluate index of these two systems were calculated and compared. Finally, sensitivity analysis were carried out to find the influence of heat recovery efficiency, solar radiation received, purge percentage and CO2 capture efficiency. The finding indicate that the thermal performance of (solar + CC) + PP is 31.20%, which means that the overall efficiency penalty is 13.44% percentage points; the thermal performance of (solar + PP) + CC is 31.09%, which means that the overall efficiency penalty is 13.57 percentage points. However, considering technical and environmental aspects, (solar + PP) + CC is better than (solar + CC) + PP. Electricity consumption for CO2 compression accounts for the biggest proportion, over 70%, and electricity consumption for the air separation unit takes the second position. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available