4.4 Article

The influence of tDCS intensity on decision-making training and transfer outcomes

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 125, Issue 2, Pages 385-397

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00423.2020

Keywords

cognitive training; decision-making; dose; multitasking; stimulation dosage; transcranial direct current stimulation

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP140100266]
  2. ARCSRI Science of Learning Research Centre [SR120300015]
  3. ARC Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function (ARC Centre Grant) [CE140100007]
  4. ARC Australian Laureate Fellowship [FL110100103]
  5. UQ Fellowship [UQFEL1607881]
  6. ARC Discovery Early Career Researcher Award [DE190100299]
  7. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

tDCS has been shown to improve single-and dual-task performance, with 1.0 mA intensity group demonstrating substantial improvements, while the 0.7 and 2.0 mA intensity groups showed less robust effects and no evidence of performance transfer.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to improve single-and dual-task performance in healthy participants and enhance transferable training gains following multiple sessions of combined stimulation and task practice. However, it has yet to be determined what the optimal stimulation dose is for facilitating such outcomes. We aimed to test the effects of different tDCS intensities, with a commonly used electrode montage, on performance outcomes in a multisession single/dual-task training and transfer protocol. In a preregistered study, 123 participants, who were pseudorandomized across four groups, each completed six sessions (pre-and posttraining sessions and four combined tDCS and training sessions) and received 20 min of prefrontal anodal tDCS at 0.7, 1.0, or 2.0 mA or 15-s sham stimulation. Response time and accuracy were assessed in trained and untrained tasks. The 1.0-mA group showed substantial improvements in single-task reaction time and dual-task accuracy, with additional evidence for improvements in dual-task reaction times, relative to sham performance. This group also showed near transfer to the single-task component of an untrained multitasking paradigm. The 0.7-and 2.0-mA intensities varied in which performance measures they improved on the trained task, but in sum, the effects were less robust than for the 1.0-mA group, and there was no evidence for the transfer of performance. Our study highlights that training performance gains are augmented by tDCS, but their magnitude and nature are not uniform across stimulation intensity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available