4.7 Review

Genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 269, Issue 2, Pages 676-692

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10461-5

Keywords

Genetic counseling; Genetic testing; Neurodegenerative disease; Huntington’ s disease; Pre-symptomatic testing

Funding

  1. University of Technology Sydney Chancellors Research scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Contemporary genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative diseases vary and are influenced by regional differences and the presence of different health providers. A flexible, multidisciplinary, client- and family-centered care continues to emerge. Health providers must balance their limited time and resources with ensuring clients are safely and effectively counseled, and all four genetic counseling goals are addressed as genetic testing becomes a routine part of care for patients. Areas of further research include diagnostic and reproductive genetic counseling/testing practices, evaluations of novel approaches to care, and the role and use of different health providers in practice.
Objective To understand contemporary genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative diseases (LONDs), and identify whether practices address the internationally accepted goals of genetic counseling: interpretation, counseling, education, and support. Methods Four databases were systematically searched for articles published from 2009 to 2020. Peer-reviewed research articles in English that reported research and clinical genetic counseling and testing practices for LONDs were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted to describe different practices and map genetic counseling activities to the goals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Qualsyst tool. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019121421). Results Sixty-one studies from 68 papers were included. Most papers focused on predictive testing (58/68) and Huntington's disease (41/68). There was variation between papers in study design, study population, outcomes, interventions, and settings. Although there were commonalities, novel and inconsistent genetic counseling practices were identified. Eighteen papers addressed all four goals of genetic counseling. Conclusion Contemporary genetic counseling and testing practices for LONDs are varied and informed by regional differences and the presence of different health providers. A flexible, multidisciplinary, client- and family-centered care continues to emerge. As genetic testing becomes a routine part of care for patients (and their relatives), health providers must balance their limited time and resources with ensuring clients are safely and effectively counseled, and all four genetic counseling goals are addressed. Areas of further research include diagnostic and reproductive genetic counseling/testing practices, evaluations of novel approaches to care, and the role and use of different health providers in practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available