4.7 Article

A critical comparison of pyrolysis of cellulose, lignin, and pine sawdust using an induction heating reactor

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages 273-280

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.041

Keywords

Pyrolysis; Lignin; Cellulose; Induction heating; Biofuel; Bio-oil

Funding

  1. LSU's Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering
  2. LSU Agricultural Center
  3. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [CBET-1437810]
  4. USDA NIFA [2011-38821-30873]
  5. USDA Hatch programs [LAB 94196]
  6. NIFA [579183, 2011-38821-30873] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fast pyrolysis of pinewood sawdust and two of its major components, namely lignin and cellulose was carried out using a laboratory scale induction-heating reactor. The effect of five different temperatures (500, 550, 600, 650 and 700 degrees C) was tested on the product yield and quality. The products were characterized to evaluate the water content, elemental composition, chemical composition and energy content. The char yield decreased with temperature for all of the biomasses. The maximum liquid yield of 55.28% was achieved at 600 degrees C for pine sawdust, and the highest liquid yields for cellulose and lignin were obtained at 500 degrees C. Water content in the liquid fraction decreased as reaction temperature increased. The GC-MS revealed that the bio-oil from cellulose was rich in anhydrosugars while majority of the liquid from lignin had high phenolic contents. Analysis of the gas fraction shows that as the temperature increases the gas yield increases, which, when paired with the declining char masses, showed an increase in the biomass breakdown at higher temperatures. Liquid fraction from pine sawdust has the highest HHV with a peak at 550 degrees C. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available