4.7 Article

Adsorption of lead ions from aqueous solutions by porous cellulose nanofiber-sodium alginate hydrogel beads

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
Volume 324, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.115122

Keywords

Porous; Cellulose nanofiber; Sodium alginate; Hydrogel beads; Lead ion removal

Funding

  1. Basic Public Welfare Research Project of Zhejiang Province [LGF21B070002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21476212]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cellulose nanofiber and sodium alginate adsorbent prepared through a cross-linking method showed efficient removal of Pb(II), with fast adsorption equilibrium, high adsorption capacity, and good cycling regeneration performance.
Herein we report a new type of adsorbent for the efficient removal of Pb(II), which is prepared from cellulose nanofiber (CNF) and sodium alginate (SA) via a simple cross-linking method. During this process, the porous structure of the hydrogel beads was formed by the disintegration of calcium phosphate. The performance and structure of the prepared beads were systematically examined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Fouriertransform infrared spectroscopy, zeta potential measurements, and scanning electron microscopy. Investigations revealed that the adsorption equilibrium was attained after approximately 120 min. In addition, 82% of Pb(II) ions were absorbed in the initial 40 min at 297 K. The adsorption process was consistent with a pseudo-second order kinetic model and the Langmuir adsorption isotherm model, and the limit adsorption capacity reached 318.47 mg g(-1). Acid treatment and regeneration experiments verified that the adsorption capacity of Pb(II) on the beads was satisfactory, and the adsorption rate remained at >80% after 5 cycles. These results indicate that the prepared beads are potential adsorbents for water treatment. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available