4.7 Article

HDAC7 Inhibition by Phenacetyl and Phenylbenzoyl Hydroxamates

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages 2186-2204

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01967

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) [1027369, 1117017, 1107914, 1093378, 1047921]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP180103244]
  3. ARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging [CE140100011]
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1093378, 1107914] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on developing new inhibitors for the zinc-containing histone deacetylase enzyme HDAC7, which show increased selectivity and potency. The addition of phthalimide capping groups improves drug performance by decreasing rotational freedom and providing hydrogen bond acceptor carbonyl/sulfonamide oxygens.
The zinc-containing histone deacetylase enzyme HDAC7 is emerging as an important regulator of immunometabolism and cancer. Here, we exploit a cavity in HDAC7, filled by Tyr303 in HDAC1, to derive new inhibitors. Phenacetyl hydroxamates and 2-phenylbenzoyl hydroxamates bind to Zn2+ and are 50-2700-fold more selective inhibitors of HDAC7 than HDAC1. Phenylbenzoyl hydroxamates are 30-70-fold more potent HDAC7 inhibitors than phenacetyl hydroxamates, which is attributed to the benzoyl aromatic group interacting with Phe679 and Phe738. Phthalimide capping groups, including a saccharin analogue, decrease rotational freedom and provide hydrogen bond acceptor carbonyl/sulfonamide oxygens that increase inhibitor potency, liver microsome stability, solubility, and cell activity. Despite being the most potent HDAC7 inhibitors to date, they are not selective among class IIa enzymes. These strategies may help to produce tools for interrogating HDAC7 biology related to its catalytic site.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available