4.7 Review

Digital Health Interventions for Cardiac Rehabilitation: Systematic Literature Review

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/18773

Keywords

cardiac rehabilitation; telemedicine; digital technologies; mHealth; mobile phone

Funding

  1. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Medical Scientist Training Program (National Institutes of Health) [5T32GM007309]
  2. National Institutes of Health: Ruth L. Kirschstein Individual Predoctoral NRSA for MD/PhD: F30 Training Grant [F30HL142131]
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) [F31 NR017328]
  4. Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award
  5. NIH/NINR [T32 NR012704]
  6. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH [TL1 TR003100]
  7. Aetna Foundation
  8. American Heart Association [20SFRN35380046, COVID19-811000]
  9. David and June Trone Family Foundation
  10. Pollin Digital Innovation Fund
  11. Google
  12. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [ME-2019C1-15328]
  13. National Institutes of Health [P01 HL108800]
  14. Nokia
  15. PJ Schafer Memorial Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Digital health technologies have the potential to address challenges associated with traditional facility-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs, but there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation on digital interventions for CR. Current research mainly focuses on physical activity counseling and exercise training, indicating a need for further studies on comprehensive CR interventions and long-term follow-up to assess the clinical impact of digital interventions.
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Despite strong evidence supporting the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), over 80% of eligible patients do not participate in CR. Digital health technologies (ie, the delivery of care using the internet, wearable devices, and mobile apps) have the potential to address the challenges associated with traditional facility-based CR programs, but little is known about the comprehensiveness of these interventions to serve as digital approaches to CR. Overall, there is a lack of a systematic evaluation of the current literature on digital interventions for CR. Objective: The objective of this systematic literature review is to provide an in-depth analysis of the potential of digital health technologies to address the challenges associated with traditional CR. Through this review, we aim to summarize the current literature on digital interventions for CR, identify the key components of CR that have been successfully addressed through digital interventions, and describe the gaps in research that need to be addressed for sustainable and scalable digital CR interventions. Methods: Our strategy for identifying the primary literature pertaining to CR with digital solutions (defined as technology employed to deliver remote care beyond the use of the telephone) included a consultation with an expert in the field of digital CR and searches of the PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases for original studies published from January 1990 to October 2018. Results: Our search returned 31 eligible studies, of which 22 were randomized controlled trials. The reviewed CR interventions primarily targeted physical activity counseling (31/31, 100%), baseline assessment (30/31, 97%), and exercise training (27/31, 87%). The most commonly used modalities were smartphones or mobile devices (20/31, 65%), web-based portals (18/31, 58%), and email-SMS (11/31, 35%). Approximately one-third of the studies addressed the CR core components of nutrition counseling, psychological management, and weight management. In contrast, less than a third of the studies addressed other CR core components, including the management of lipids, diabetes, smoking cessation, and blood pressure. Conclusions: Digital technologies have the potential to increase access and participation in CR by mitigating the challenges associated with traditional, facility-based CR. However, previously evaluated interventions primarily focused on physical activity counseling and exercise training. Thus, further research is required with more comprehensive CR interventions and long-term follow-up to understand the clinical impact of digital interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available