4.7 Article

SrTiO3-CaCr0.5Nb0.5O3 solid solutions as p-type photocatalysts for Z-scheme water splitting under visible light illumination

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 87, Issue -, Pages 46-53

Publisher

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.01.039

Keywords

p-Type semiconductor; Photocatalyst; Z-scheme; Water splitting; Solid solution

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972233]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [19ZR1459200]
  3. Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [14DZ2261100]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P-type semiconductivity was observed in the solid solution series (SrTiO3)(1-x)(CaCr0.5Nb0.5 O-3)(x) (0.0 <= x <= 0.15), which showed superior H-2 evolution photocatalytic performance under visible light, with an optimal composition achieving an AQE of as high as 1.02%. The Z-scheme system containing (SrTiO3)(0.85)(CaCr0.5Nb0.5O3)(0.15), WO3 and I-/IO3- redox couple successfully realized stoichiometric H-2/O-2 production under visible light illumination.
P-type semiconductivity has been observed in solid solution series (SrTiO3)(1-x)(CaCr0.5Nb0.5 O-3)(x) (0.0 <= x <= 0.15), which all adopt cubic symmetry and own intense absorption in the visible light region. These solid solutions are superior H-2 evolution photocatalysts under visible light illumination (lambda >= 400 nm). An AQE as high as 1.02 % at 420 +/- 20 nm has been achieved at optimal composition (SrTiO3)(0.85)(CaCr0.5Nb0.5O3)(0.15) which significantly surpasses the parent compounds. Stoichiometric H-2/O-2 production under visible light illumination has been successfully realized using Z-scheme system containing (SrTiO3)(0.85)(CaCr0.5Nb0.5O3)(0.15), WO3 and I-/IO3- redox couple. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available