4.6 Article

Effect of pre-existing nuclei on microstructure and magnetic properties of high Bs FINEMET-like nanocrystalline alloys

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 56, Issue 15, Pages 9254-9262

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-021-05861-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0300500]
  2. S&T Innovation 2025 Major Special Program [2018B10084]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51801224, 51771161]
  4. Leading Talents of Tianshan Cedar Program of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region [2019XS02]
  5. Tianshan Innovation Team Program of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region [2020D14038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that a large number of pre-existing crystal nuclei in the alloy can produce tiny nanocrystals, resulting in improved soft magnetic properties. By controlling the average nanocrystal size, the best magnetic performance can be achieved.
The effect of conventional annealing and rapid annealing on the magnetic properties and microstructure of Fe78+2xSi7.2-xB13-xCu0.8Nb1 (x = 0, 1, 2) alloys is discussed systematically. The study was found that the existence of a large number of pre-existing nuclei in the amorphous phase of Fe82Si5.2B11Cu0.8Nb1 alloy can produce tiny nanocrystals and thus result in excellent soft magnetic properties. When the average nanocrystal size is 16 nm using rapid annealing, the best soft magnetic performance can be obtained, in which B-s reaches 1.80 T, H-c is 5 A/m, and mu is 20,000 at 1 kHz. The crystallization kinetics shows that as the Fe content increases, the incubation time of nucleation of the alloys decreases, and the nucleation is faster and easier. In addition, a large number of pre-existing crystal nuclei not only greatly reduces the nucleation activation energy of the alloy but also achieves grain refinement and excellent magnetic properties through grain competition growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available