4.6 Article

Mechanism of lateral metal flow on residual stress distribution during hot strip rolling

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116838

Keywords

Lateral metal flow; Residual stress; Unit crown; Self-correcting effect; Critical buckling stress

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51975043, 51604024]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [3182026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During hot strip rolling, lateral metal flow can reduce the risk of buckling deformation by changing the longitudinal residual stress. The self-correcting effect of lateral metal flow on residual stress was confirmed through experiments, indicating that metals tend to flow towards the direction helping reduce the maximum residual compressive stress.
During hot strip rolling, the lateral metal flow can change the longitudinal residual stress to reduce the risk of buckling deformation of the strip. The mechanism of lateral metal flow on residual stress was studied by combining a residual stress model with experimentation. A buckling risk coefficient was proposed to quantify the risk of buckling deformation. The calculated results show that the lateral metal flow has a self-correcting effect on the residual stress caused by the change in unit crown, this is, metals preferentially flow towards the direction helping reduce the maximum residual compressive stress. Changes in width and thickness of the strip induce a large difference in the attenuation of the maximum residual compressive stress even if the unit crown has the same change. For instance, under a large reduction rate the mode of residual stress may change from the edgewaves to the W-waves mode. A novel rolling experiment was developed, in which the grid method was employed to capture the tiny metal flow along the width. The measured lateral metal flow law is consistent with the description of the self-correcting effect of the lateral metal flow.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available