4.7 Article

Conceptual energy and water recovery system for self-sustained nano membrane toilet

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 352-361

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.07.083

Keywords

Thermochemical conversion; Energy recovery; Non-sewered sanitary systems; Nano Membrane Toilet; Process modelling; Reinvent the Toilet Challenge

Funding

  1. Bill AMP
  2. Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With about 2.4 billion people worldwide without access to improved sanitation facilities, there is a strong incentive for development of novel sanitation systems to improve the quality of life and reduce mortality. The Nano Membrane Toilet is expected to provide a unique household-scale system that would produce electricity and recover water from human excrement and urine. This study was undertaken to evaluate the performance of the conceptual energy and water recovery system for the Nano Membrane Toilet designed for a household of ten people and to assess its self-sustainability. A process model of the entire. system, including the thermochemical conversion island, a Stirling engine and a water recovery system was developed in Aspen Plus (R). The energy and water recovery system for the Nano Membrane Toilet was characterised with the specific net power output of 23.1 Wh/kg(settledsolids) and water recovery rate of 13.4 dm(3)/day in the nominal operating mode. Additionally, if no supernatant was processed, the specific net power output was increased to 69.2 Wh/kg(settledsolids). Such household-scale system would deliver the net power output (1.9-5.8 W). This was found to be enough to charge mobile phones or power clock radios, or provide light for the household using low-voltage LED bulbs. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available