4.7 Review

Selective hydrogenation of phenol for cyclohexanone: A review

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2020.11.022

Keywords

Phenol; Cyclohexanone; Selective hydrogenation; Metallic catalysts; Heteropoly acids

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the green chemistry method of producing cyclohexanone from phenol, analyzing the performance differences of different catalysts in hydrogenation reactions and the potential development prospects of these catalysts.
Cyclohexanone from phenol attractively meets the requirements of green chemistry, through catalytic selective hydrogenation, the prevalent methodology in rapid progress recently. In this background, pathways under this methodology are reviewed herein, including possible cyclohexanone formation mechanisms proposed in those years, as well as the corresponding catalysts, such as noble metal, non-noble metal and emerging amorphous alloy and heteropoly acids. Among the common catalysts, Pdbased catalysts exhibit excellent performance in both conversion and selectivity. Usually, the conversion and selectivity reached almost 100% after the opportune treatment of the metal and support. Other catalysts such as Pt, Rh, Ni, etc., only perform well in conversion rather than selectivity and the product is mainly cyclohexanol. Amorphous alloys and heteropoly acids, although still relatively rare compared with traditional metal catalysts, are bright in prospects indicated by achievements in this field. The reaction mechanism on some catalysts, indistinct to the community, is still in the way of development to overcome the letdown of catalyst design for higher conversion and selectivity industrially. After horizontal comparison of different catalysts, this article manages to give some advice on possible methods contributing to the design of efficient and inexpensive catalytic systems. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available