4.1 Article

Comparative ecology of two specialist bees: Dasypoda visnaga Rossi, 1790 and Dasypoda maura Perez, 1895 (Hymenoptera, Melittidae)

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYMENOPTERA RESEARCH
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 109-126

Publisher

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/jhr.81.60528

Keywords

Conservation; floral preferences; habitat requirements; nesting behaviour; phenology; Scolymus

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal German Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) through the International Climate Initiative (IKI)
  2. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
  3. Research Foundation of Flanders -FWO under EOS Project [3094785]
  4. Academie de Recherche et d'Enseignement Superieur (ARES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study on Dasypoda visnaga and Dasypoda maura shows minor differences in their habitat requirements, with both species exhibiting similar nesting behaviors and floral preferences.
Many wild bee species are declining globally. To design efficient mitigation strategies to slow down or reverse these trends, we urgently need to better understand their basic ecological requirements. In this context, we studied two specialist species for which ecological data are scarce: Dasypoda visnaga and Dasypoda maura. We provide for the first-time detailed information on their phenologies, morphological traits, floral preferences, and nesting behaviours based on historical data and new samples from Morocco. The flight season of both species extends from late spring to late summer but D. maura emerges earlier than D. visnaga. Though the two species show different morphological traits, palynological analyses show that D. visnaga and D. maura females collect almost exclusively pollen from Sco/ymus sp. (Asteraceae). Concerning their nesting behaviour, D. visnaga seems to he more gregarious than D. maura. Both species build nests in sandy soil that can reach a depth of 80 cm. These ecological observations show that the differences between D. visnaga and D. maura are minor with regards to habitat requirements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available