4.5 Article

A novel method of donor.recipient size matching in pediatric heart transplantation: A total cardiac volume.predictive model

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 158-165

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.11.002

Keywords

pediatric heart transplantation; pediatric heart failure; 3D imaging; size matching; total cardiac volume

Funding

  1. National Institute of Healths [1R01HL147957-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By utilizing anthropometric measurements and 1-view CXR cardiac measurements, accurate predictions of total cardiac volume (TCV) for donor candidates can be made. Model C had the most accurate prediction of TCV and outperformed other models.
BACKGROUND: The pediatric heart transplant community uses weight-based donor-to-recipient size matching almost exclusively, despite no evidence to validate weight as a reliable surrogate of cardiac size. Donor size mismatch is the second most common reason for the refusal of donor hearts in current practice (similar to 30% of all refusals). Whereas case-by-case segmentation of total cardiac volume (TCV) by computed tomography (CT) for direct virtual transplantation is an attractive option, it remains limited by the unavailability of donor chest CT. We sought to establish a predictive model for donor TCV on the basis of anthropomorphic and chest X-ray (CXR) cardiac measures. METHODS: Banked imaging studies from 141 subjects with normal CT chest angiograms were obtained and segmented using 3-dimensional modeling to derive TCV. CXR data were available for 62 of those subjects. A total of 3 predictive models of TCV were fit through multiple linear regression using the following variables: Model A (weight only); Model B (weight, height, sex, and age); Model C (weight, height, sex, age, and 1-view anteroposterior CXR maximal horizontal cardiac width). RESULTS: Model C provided the most accurate prediction of TCV (optimism corrected R-2 = 0.99, testing set R-2 = 0.98, mean absolute percentage error [MAPE] = 8.6%) and outperformed Model A (optimism corrected R-2 = 0.94, testing set R-2 = 0.94, MAPE = 16.1%) and Model B (optimism corrected R-2 = 0.97, testing set R-2 = 0.97, MAPE = 11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: TCV can be predicted accurately using readily available anthropometrics and a 1-view CXR from donor candidates. This simple and scalable method of TCV estimation may provide a reliable and consistent method to improve donor size matching. (C) 2020 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available