Journal
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102439
Keywords
Early-life health; Vaccinations; Preventive care; Health behavior
Funding
- Innovation Foundation Denmark [5155-00001B]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Implementing a vaccination reminder letter policy can positively impact vaccination adherence, but some parents remain non-adherent due to refusal. Therefore, in addition to reminder letters, other policies such as mandatory vaccination laws are necessary.
This paper studies non-adherence in the Danish Childhood Vaccination Program using a nationwide introduction of a vaccination reminder letter policy and administrative data from 2011-2017. First, I provide causal estimates of how the reminder letter policy affects vaccination adherence using a Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD). Second, I link parental responses to the reminder letter to parents' causes for being non-adherent. I find that the reminder letter policy positively affects adherence. However, 72% of non-adherent parents are non-responsive to the reminder letter indicating that reluctance and not inattention is the leading cause for non-adherence. Thus, other policies beyond reminder letters such as mandatory vaccination laws - are necessary to substantially increase vaccination coverage. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available