4.7 Article

The level of exposure affects the arsenic urinary methylation profile of a population of children

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 415, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125623

Keywords

Northern Argentina; T860C As3MT gene polymorphism; Methylation capacity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the arsenic methylation capacity of Argentine children exposed to different levels of arsenic in drinking water, considering gender and the As3MT T860C gene polymorphism. The level of exposure was found to affect the methylation of arsenic, and the presence of the As3MT polymorphism and gender also played a role in arsenic methylation.
Differences in the As methylation capacity of Argentine children, exposed to different levels of As in drinking water were evaluated, considering the gender and the presence of the As3MT T860C gene polymorphism. Inorganic As (%IAs), monomethylated As (%MMA) and dimethylated As (%DMA), primary methylation index (PMI) and secondary methylation index (SMI) were evaluated and represented the As methylation capacity. Urinary As ranged from 18 to 5106 ug/g creatinine. Comparisons were performed between lowest and highest quartiles of urinary As. The level of exposure was positively related to urinary %MMA and negatively to %DMA and to SMI. Considering the presence of the As3MT T860C polymorphism, the level of exposure increased % MMA, and decreased %DMA and the SMI in carriers of the T/T genotype. SMI OR for T/T carriers was 10.61 (95% CI: 2.16-52.16, p: 0.0036). Regarding the gender, the level of exposure increased %MMA, and decreased % DMA and the SMI in girls and boys. SMI OR for girls was 8.71 (95% CI: 1.48-51.08, p: 0.0165) and for boys, OR: 18.15 (95% CI: 2.03-162.35, p: 0.0095). It was possible to identify the level of exposure as a factor that can modify the influence that other factors have on the methylation of As.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available