Journal
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 1778-1787Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15472
Keywords
clip; colonoscopy; endoscopic mucosal resection; hemorrhage; meta‐ analysis
Categories
Funding
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan [V108C-128, V109C-020]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Prophylactic clipping can effectively reduce delayed bleeding following endoscopic mucosal resection of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions, particularly at proximal locations. Complete wound closure is more effective in preventing bleeding compared to partial closure, but no benefit was observed for clipping in preventing perforation or post-polypectomy syndrome. Further cost analyses are needed to determine the most cost-effective strategies.
Background and Aim It is not clear whether prophylactic clipping after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (LNPCLs) prevents delayed bleeding (DB). We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to clarify the efficacy of prophylactic clipping in prevention of DB following EMR of LNPCLs. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library databases, and for studies that compared clipping versus (vs) nonclipping in prevention of DB following EMR of LNPCLs. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was determined using a random effects model. The pooled ORs of DB, perforation, and post-polypectomy syndrome in the clipping group compared with the nonclipping group comprised the outcomes. Subgroup analyses based on study design, polyp location, and completeness of wound closure were performed. Results Five studies with a total of 3112 LNPCLs were extracted. Prophylactic clipping reduced the risk of DB compared with nonclipping (3.3% vs 6.2%, OR: 0.494, P = 0.002) following EMR of LNPCLs. In subgroup analysis, prophylactic clipping reduced DB of LNPCLs at proximal location (3.8% vs 9.8%, P = 0.029), but not of them at distal location (P = 0.830). Complete wound closure showed superior efficacy to prevent DB compared with partial closure (2.0% vs 5.4%, P = 0.004). No benefit of clipping for preventing perforation or post-polypectomy syndrome was observed (P = 0.301 and 0.988, respectively). Conclusions Prophylactic clipping can reduce DB following EMR of LNPCLs at proximal location. Besides, complete wound closure showed superior efficacy to prevent DB compared with partial closure. Further cost analyses should be conducted to implement the most cost-effective strategies.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available