4.7 Article

Ice recrystallization inhibition of commercial κ-, ι-, and λ-carrageenans

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
Volume 290, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110269

Keywords

Carrageenans; H-1 NMR spectroscopy; Ice crystal shape; Ice recrystallization inhibition; Viscosity

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [WE 6416/2-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the structural composition of commercial kappa (kappa)-, iota (iota)-, lambda (lambda)-carrageenans was examined using H-1 NMR spectroscopy, and the IRI activity of these different carrageenan samples was investigated in sucrose solution. The results revealed that the IRI activities varied among different carrageenan suppliers, which may be attributed to structural and possibly other compositional differences.
In this study, the structural composition of commercial kappa (kappa)-, iota (iota)-, lambda (lambda)-carrageenans was examined by using H-1 NMR spectroscopy, and the IRI activity of these different carrageenan samples was examined in sucrose solution. The H-1 NMR spectra showed that both lambda-carrageenans consist of kappa- and iota-units which are either present as a mixture of the two carrageenan types or as a kappa/iota-copolymer. According to the IRI activity results, kappa-carrageenan samples showed the highest IRI activity among the different carrageenans. In the presence of kappa-carrageenan, the round ice crystals transformed into a more angular and elongated shape, while this effect was less visible in the presence of the iota- and kappa-carrageenans. Viscosity measurements indicated that there is no correlation between the viscosity and the IRI activity of carrageenans. The IRI activities of the investigated carrageenans are different for the suppliers, and the results show that they are based on the structural differences and possibly also other compositional differences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available