4.7 Article

Mass transfer to freely suspended particles a high Peclet number

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 913, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.1177

Keywords

particle/fluid flows; Stokesian dynamics; coupled diffusion and flow

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [846648]
  2. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [846648] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study generalizes asymptotic results to analyze the influence of particle shape on the surface flux under different flow conditions, finding that slender ellipsoids have higher surface flux.
In a theoretical analysis, we generalise well-known asymptotic results to obtain expressions for the rate of transfer of material from the surface of an arbitrary, rigid particle suspended in an open pathline flow at large Peclet number, Pe. The flow may be steady or periodic in time. We apply this result to numerically evaluate expressions for the surface flux to a freely suspended, axisymmetric ellipsoid (spheroid) in Stokes flow driven by a steady linear shear. We complement these analytical predictions with numerical simulations conducted over a range of Pe = 10(1)-10(4) and confirm good agreement at large Peclet number. Our results allow us to examine the influence of particle shape upon the surface flux for a broad class of flows. When the background flow is irrotational, the surface flux is steady and is prescribed by three parameters only: the Peclet number, the particle aspect ratio and the strain topology. We observe that slender prolate spheroids tend to experience a higher surface flux compared to oblate spheroids with equivalent surface area. For rotational flows, particles may begin to spin or tumble, which may suppress or augment the convective transfer due to a realignment of the particle with respect to the strain field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available