4.7 Article

Assessment of the validity of some common assumptions in hygrothermal modeling of earth based materials

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages 498-511

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.01.025

Keywords

Heat and moisture transport; Hygrothermal modeling; Numerical simulation; Rammed earth; Adobe; Cob

Funding

  1. French Research National Agency (ANR) through the Villes et Batiments Durables program [ANR-12-VBDU-0001]
  2. Fellowship CMIRA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this paper is to identify the effects of in-pore transport of liquid water and water vapor as well as phase changes on the hygrothermal behavior of earthen buildings. Indeed, one of the main assets used to promote these constructions is their role in moisture buffering hence temperature and relative humidity quality controlling. However, there is no clear consensus yet concerning the impact of these phenomena on the global energy performance of the buildings. A coupled model is therefore proposed in this paper, based on heat and mass balances inside the earthen walls, in order to clarify this question. This model considers separately the kinematics of each phase (e.g. liquid water, vapor, dry air and solid matrix), in interaction with each other. It also takes into account the impact of pore water confinement on the liquid-to-vapor phase change, in particular on the resulting latent heat released or absorbed. The model is successfully compared to experimental results on instrumented full-scale rammed earth wall subjected to temperature cycles. It eventually allows identifying the singular hygrothermal behavior of earth material by testing the range of applicability of the simplifying assumptions which are commonly made in function of the permeability of the tested material. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available