4.7 Article

A comprehensive modeling framework to evaluate soil erosion by water and tillage

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 279, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111631

Keywords

Soil erosion; Soil loss; Sediment transport; No-till; Tillage; Coupled model

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture - National Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA) project [ILLU-741-380]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil erosion caused by unsustainable agricultural activities poses a major threat to soil health and water quality globally. A modeling framework combining physically based models like WEPP and MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 was presented in this study to quantify and simulate soil erosion. Results from scenario-based simulations in an intensively managed agricultural watershed in Illinois showed significant reductions in total soil loss and sediment yield by implementing no-till practices, particularly in areas most vulnerable to sediment production.
Soil erosion is significantly increased and accelerated by unsustainable agricultural activities, resulting in one of the major threats to soil health and water quality worldwide. Quantifying soil erosion under different conservation practices is important for watershed management and a framework that can capture the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil erosion by water is required. In this paper, a modeling framework that coupled physically based models, Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) and MIKE SHE/MIKE 11, was presented. Daily soil loss at a grid-scale resolution was determined using WEPP and the transport processes were simulated using a generic advection dispersion equation in MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 models. The framework facilitated the physical simulation of sediment production at the field scale and transport processes across the watershed. The coupled model was tested using an intensively managed agricultural watershed in Illinois. The impacts of no-till practice on both sediment production and sediment yield were evaluated using scenario-based simulations with different fractions of no-till and conventional tillage combinations. The results showed that if no-till were implemented for all fields throughout the watershed, 76% and 72% reductions in total soil loss and sediment yield, respectively, can be achieved. In addition, if no-till practice were implemented in the most vulnerable areas to sediment production across the watershed, a 40% no-till implementation can achieve almost the same reduction as 100% no-till implementation. Based on the simulation results, the impacts of no-till practice are more prominent if implemented where it is most needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available