Analysis of suitable private-secondary-main sewer diameters in rural areas based on cost model and hydraulic calculation

High cost of sewer systems usually restricts the sewage collection in rural areas. Many rural areas take traditional sewer scheme whose private-secondary-main sewer diameter is 110-200-300 mm without hydraulic calculation and increased the total cost of sewers. The rational utilization of small diameter sewers might contribute to sewer cost reduction. In this study, rural sewer length and cost models were established taking sewer diameter, household number, and length/width ratio of village as parameters to evaluate the cost benefits of using small diameter sewers. Hydraulic calculation of sewers was applied by Storm Water Management Model to ensure the small diameter sewers were feasible. The results indicate that household number and length/width ratio cause obvious impact on sewer length and cost. Main sewer with 200 mm diameter is suitable for the village with less than 1000 households. Using small diameter sewers can reduce the sewer cost by 6-15% compared with traditional sewer scheme and 110-110-200 might be the better scheme to rural areas because of the low cost (including construction cost and operation and maintenance cost) and high tolerance of sewage flow fluctuation. This study provided the suitable diameter of rural sewers based on cost model and hydraulic calculation which might be helpful for the application of rural sewers.

Automated summary

High cost of sewer systems hinders sewage collection in rural areas, but using small diameter sewers can reduce costs. This study establishes cost models and hydraulic calculations to determine suitable sewer diameters for rural areas, finding that 200mm main sewers are suitable for villages with less than 1000 households.