4.7 Article

Estimation of greenhouse gas and odour emissions from a cold region municipal biological nutrient removal wastewater treatment plant

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 281, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111864

Keywords

Municipal wastewater; Biological nutrient removal (BNR) system; Greenhouse gas (GHG) and odour emission rate estimates (EREs)

Funding

  1. NSERC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seasonal temperature variations in cold regions lead to variable gas emissions from MWTPs, with this study focusing on determining greenhouse gas and odour emission rate estimates from an open-to-air BNR type MWTP in Saskatoon, Canada. Results showed differences in emissions between winter and summer samples, with higher emissions in summer and the aerobic reactor as the dominant source of greenhouse gas emissions in both seasons. Additionally, changes in aeration rates and treatment configurations impacted the emission rate estimates.
Seasonal temperature variations in cold regions worldwide lead to variable gas emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWTPs) due to changing wastewater temperatures in open-to-air treatment processes. The objective of this study was to determine the greenhouse gas (including carbon dioxide, CO2; methane, CH4; and nitrous oxide, N2O) and odour (including ammonia, NH3 ; and hydrogen sulphide, H2S) emission rate estimates (EREs) from the open-to-air processes of a biological nutrient removal (BNR) type MWTP in Saskatoon, SK, Canada. This MWTP experiences seasonal temperatures from -40 degrees C to 30 degrees C with the resultant wastewater temperatures considered herein of 13 degrees C and 17 degrees C being chosen based on monitoring data for winter and summer, respectively. Laboratory-scale reactors simulating anaerobic, anoxic, aerobic, and settling treatment processes were used to monitor gas EREs using wastewater samples taken from the analogous MWTP processes during the winter and summer seasons. Results indicated that the overall winter EREs for CO2, CH4, and N2O were 45,129 kg CO2/d, 21.9 kg CH4/d, and 3.20 kg N2O/d, respectively, while the H2S EREs were insignificant. The higher temperature for the summer samples resulted in increased EREs for CH4 , N2O, and H2S EREs of 33.0 kg CH4/d, 3.87 kg N2O/d, and 2.29 kg H2S/d, respectively. However, the CO2 EREs were reduced to 37,794 kg CO2/d. Overall, the aerobic reactor was the dominant source of the GHG emissions for both seasons. In addition, studied changes in the aerobic reactor aeration rates (in reactor) and BNR treatment configurations (from site) further impacted the EREs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available