4.7 Article

Economic impact of integrating PCM as passive system in buildings using Fanger comfort model

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 112, Issue -, Pages 159-172

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.12.006

Keywords

PCM in building envelopes; Fanger thermal comfort; EnergyPlus simulation; Payback period

Funding

  1. Spanish government [ENE2011-22722]
  2. European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7) [PIRSES-GA-2013-610692]
  3. Education Ministry of Chile [PMI ANT 1201]
  4. CONICYT/FONDAP SERC-Chile [15110019]
  5. CONICYT/FONDAP [PMI ANT 1201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In buildings, HVAC systems consume a high amount of energy to provide thermal comfort for occupants. A methodology is presented in this paper to control thermostat operation of the buildings considering the effects of indoor and outdoor boundary conditions and phase change material (PCM) characteristics. EnergyPlus v8.1 building energy simulation software was used to analyze the energy performance of the PCM incorporated building models and to implement Fanger model to control HVAC thermostat operation according to BS EN 15251:2007 thermal comfort categories. Three types of building HVAC schedule, PCM with different melting points and layer thicknesses were studied for Madrid climate zone. Moreover, the impact of occupants clothing on the energy consumption was investigated. Furthermore, payback analysis was conducted to find out the economic benefits of PCM integration into the building envelopes. Application of PCM improved the cooling and heating energy performances except for the office model in winter (heating period). Additionally, higher energy savings and lower payback periods were observed when PCM with higher melting point was applied to the buildings. Eventually, energy savings in PCM incorporated models were found to improve further when occupants changed their clothing behavior in winter. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available