Plant biodiversity and carbon sequestration potential of the planted forest in Brahmaputra flood plains

Globally, while experts debated whether planted forests (PF) restore biodiversity or create biological deserts, their potential role in mitigating climate change is mostly overlooked. In this study, we investigated the longterm impact of PF on the species composition, plant diversity, biomass stock, and carbon (C) storage potential in the Brahmaputra flood plain of North-East India. The phytosociological study was conducted using a modified Gentry plot method and species-specific allometric models were used to estimate biomass stock in the 39-year old PF and equivalent age of natural forest (NF). We identified 57 trees, 22 shrubs, and 23 herb species in the PF, and 54 trees, 17 shrubs, and 8 herb species in the NF. Species richness and biodiversity indices showed greater values in PF whereas species dominance and evenness were higher in NF. After 39-year of plantation, total biomass C was estimated at 165 Mg C ha1 in PF and 197 Mg C ha1 in equivalent age of NF. Bombax ceiba, Dalbergia sissoo, Samanea saman, Tetrameles nodiflora, and Gmelina arborea were the dominant tree species that contribute 56% of the total biomass C in the PF. The ecosystem carbon pool (plant biomass + deadwood + litter + SOC) was 17% higher in NF and showed the greater potential of carbon dioxide sequestration (959 Mg CO2 ha 1) compared to the PF (818 Mg CO2 ha-1). Our study suggested PF in flood plain degraded lands can act as a major C sink and stored a substantial amount of carbon dioxide after 39-year of the plantation. It is concluded that PF can be a preferable ecosystem management tool to fulfill the objectives of biodiversity conservation and provisioning climate services like C sequestration.

Automated summary

The study on planted forests in the Brahmaputra flood plain of North-East India revealed that compared to natural forests, planted forests have a certain impact on biomass and carbon storage potential, with higher biodiversity but lower carbon storage capacity than natural forests.