4.7 Article

Predicting future monthly residential energy consumption using building characteristics and climate data: A statistical learning approach

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.076

Keywords

Forecasting energy; Multivariate adaptive regression splines; Regression trees; Model validation

Funding

  1. CPS Energy
  2. University of Texas at San Antonio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper a large-scale study is presented that applies statistical learning methods to predict future monthly energy consumption for single-family detached homes using building attributes and monthly climate data. Building data is collected from over 426,305 homes in Bexar County, TX with four years of monthly energy consumption (natural gas and electricity). The goal of this study is to establish reliable models for forecasting residential energy consumption, understand the predictive value of building attributes, identify differences in predictability between households, and measure the robustness in model performance given uncertainty in climate forecasts. Assuming accurate climate forecasts, results show future monthly energy consumption can reasonably be predicted for out-of-sample households, with 74% accuracy at the household level and over 90% accuracy for predicting aggregate monthly energy usage. However, model performance is significantly different between households with distinct fuel types. Using historical climate forecast, results also demonstrate that model predictability significantly decays at both the household and aggregate level, but is robust at the household level when measured by the median home. Model selection and variable importance plots illustrate several building characteristics significantly contribute to predicting monthly energy consumption while most provide marginal predictive value. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available