ORCID

Introduction: Electrocardiogram interpretation is an essential skill for emergency and critical care nurses and physicians. There remains a gap in standardized curricula and evaluation strategies used to achieve and assess competence in electrocardiogram interpretation. The purpose of this study was to develop an importance ranking of the 120 American Heart Association electrocardiogram diagnostic labels with interdisciplinary perspectives to inform curriculum development. Methods: Data for this mixed methods study were collected through focus groups and individual semi-structured interviews. A card sort was used to assign relative importance scores to all 120 American Heart Association electrocardiogram diagnostic labels. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data on participants' rationale for the rankings. Results: The 18 participants included 6 emergency and critical care registered nurses, 5 cardiologists, and 7 emergency medicine physicians. The 5 diagnoses chosen as the most important by all disciplines were ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, atrial fibrillation, complete heart block, and normal electrocardiogram. The top 20 diagnoses by each discipline were also reported. Qualitative thematic content analysis revealed that participants from all 3 disciplines identified skill in electrocardiogram interpretation as clinically imperative and acknowledged the importance of recognizing normal, life threatening, and time -sensitive electrocardiogram rhythms. Additional qualitative themes, identified by individual disciplines, were reported. Discussion: This mixed-methods approach provided valuable interdisciplinary perspectives concerning electrocardiogram curriculum case selection and prioritization. Study findings can provide a foundation for emergency and critical care educators to create local ECG educational programs. Further work is recommended to validate the list amongst a larger population of emergency and critical care frontline nurses and physicians.

Automated summary

This study aimed to develop an importance ranking of American Heart Association electrocardiogram diagnostic labels through interdisciplinary perspectives. Results showed that participants from all disciplines identified skill in electrocardiogram interpretation as clinically imperative, recognizing the importance of identifying normal, life-threatening, and time-sensitive electrocardiogram rhythms.