4.5 Article

A simplified critical illness severity scoring system (CISSS): Development and internal validation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
Volume 61, Issue -, Pages 21-28

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.09.029

Keywords

APACHE; Automated; Computerized; Illness severity score; Intensive care units; Mortality

Funding

  1. VA Office of Rural Health
  2. Center for Comprehensive Access & Delivery Research & Evaluation (CADRE), Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Program [CIN-13-412]
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center [14380]
  4. Health Services Research and development (HSR&D) Service through the Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) Center [CIN 13-412]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to develop a simplified critical illness severity scoring system with high prediction accuracy for 30-day mortality using commonly available variables. The newly created system showed excellent performance in predicting 30-day mortality internally and required easily extracted commonly used variables from electronic health records.
Purpose: To create a simplified critical illness severity scoring system with high prediction accuracy for 30-day mortality using only commonly available variables. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of ICU admissions 2010-2015 in 306 ICUs in 117 Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals. We randomly divided our cohort into a training dataset (75%) and a validation dataset (25%). We created a critical illness severity scoring system (CISSS) using age, comorbidities, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, temperature, respiratory rate, hematocrit, white blood cell count, creatinine, sodium, glucose, albumin, bilirubin, bicarbonate, use of invasive mechanical ventilation, and whether the admission was surgical or not. We validated the performance of CISSS to predict 30-day mortality internally. Results: After excluding 31,743 re-admissions, we divided our sample (n = 534,001) into a training (n = 400,613) and a validation dataset ( n = 133,388). In the training dataset, the area under the curve (AUC) of CISSS was 0.847(95%CI = 0.845-0.850). In the validation dataset, the AUC was 0.848 (95%CI = 0.844-0.852), the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was 1.00 (95%CI = 0.98-1.02), and Brier's score for 30-day mortality was 0.058 (95%CI = 0.057-0.059). CISSS calibration was acceptable. Conclusions: CISSS has very good performance and requires only commonly used variables that can be easily extracted by electronic health records. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available