4.6 Article

Model-independent energy budget for LISA

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/01/072

Keywords

cosmological phase transitions; gravitational waves / sources; particle physics cosmology connection

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under Germany's Excellence Strategy - EXC 2121 Quantum Universe [390833306]
  2. European Union [796961]
  3. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [796961] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study presents a simple method to obtain the kinetic energy fraction in gravitational waves generated during a cosmological first-order phase transition based on wall velocity and quantities from the particle physics model at the nucleation temperature. The study compares results for deflagrations and hybrids, provides a Python code snippet for calculating the kinetic energy fraction, and evaluates realistic deviations in speed of sound close to the phase transition temperature in a specific model.
We provide an easy method to obtain the kinetic energy fraction in gravitational waves, generated during a cosmological first-order phase transition, as a function of only the wall velocity and quantities that can be determined from the particle physics model at the nucleation temperature. This generalizes recent work that achieved this goal for detonations. Here we present the corresponding results for deflagrations and hybrids. Unlike for detonations, the sound speed in the symmetric phase also enters the analysis. We perform a detailed comparison between our model-independent approach and other approaches in the literature. We provide a Python code snippet to determine the kinetic energy fraction K as a function of the wall velocity, the two speeds of sound and the strength parameter of the phase transition. We also assess how realistic sizable deviations in speed of sound are close to the phase transition temperature in a specific model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available