4.6 Article

Vision-Based Method Integrating Deep Learning Detection for Tracking Multiple Construction Machines

Journal

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000957

Keywords

Multiple object tracking; Construction machines; Deep learning; Tracking by detection

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN/2019-04659]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A vision-based method called construction machine tracker (CMT) is proposed to track multiple construction machines in videos, achieving high accuracy in multiple object tracking. CMT consists of detection, association, and assignment modules, using the YOLOv3 algorithm for construction machine detection. Testing showed a processing speed of 20.8 frames per second and 93.2% accuracy in multiple object tracking.
Tracking construction machines in videos is a fundamental step in the automated surveillance of construction productivity, safety, and project progress. However, existing vision-based tracking methods are not able to achieve high tracking precision, robustness, and practical processing speed simultaneously. Occlusions and illumination variations on construction sites also prevent vision-based tracking methods from obtaining optimal tracking performance. To address these challenges, this research proposes a vision-based method, called construction machine tracker (CMT), to track multiple construction machines in videos. CMT consists of three main modules: detection, association, and assignment. The detection module detects construction machines using the deep learning algorithm YOLOv3 in each frame. Then the association module relates the detection results of two consecutive frames, and the assignment module produces the tracking results. In testing, CMT achieved 93.2% in multiple object tracking accuracy (MOTA) and 86.5% in multiple object tracking precision (MOTP) with a processing speed of 20.8 frames per second when tested on four construction videos. The proposed CMT was integrated into a framework of analyzing excavator productivity in earthmoving cycles and achieved 96.9% accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available