4.6 Article

Deep Floor Plan Analysis for Complicated Drawings Based on Style Transfer

Journal

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000942

Keywords

Indoor spaces; Floor plan analysis; Style transfer; Conditional generative adversarial

Funding

  1. National Spatial Information Research Program - Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport [19NSIP-B135746-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a novel method for extracting indoor structures from complex floor plans, by processing building elements into vectorized form and unifying various plan formats into a consistent style using conditional generative adversarial networks. The experimental results show that the proposed model performs comparably to existing methods in detecting and recognizing rooms, with superior performance in one-to-one matches.
This paper presents a novel approach to retrieve indoor structures from raster images of complicated floor plans. We extract the building elements in the floor plan and process them into a vectorized form to provide indoor layout information. Unlike conventional approaches, the proposed model is robust when recognizing rooms and openings surrounded by obscuring patterns, including superimposed graphics and irregular notation. To this end, we integrate various floor plan formats into a unified style using conditional generative adversarial networks prior to vectorization. This style-transferred plan that follows the unified style represents the room structure intuitively and is readily vectorized due to its concise expression. Raster-to-vector conversion is conducted with a combinatorial optimization in junction units of the layout. The experimental results demonstrate that when implemented with complex drawings, our model is comparable to existing methods in the detection and recognition of rooms and provides a much better score in one-to-one matches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available