4.7 Article

Parametric analysis for performance enhancement of phase change materials in naturally ventilated buildings

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages 35-45

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.065

Keywords

Phase change materials (PCMs); Thermal comfort; Building thermal simulation; Building thermal performance; Thermal storage efficiency

Funding

  1. CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship
  2. Swinburne University of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a design optimization related to the application of phase change materials within buildings, which aims to maximize the utilization of latent heat capacity to improve indoor thermal comfort during summer season. Two performance indicators are developed: efficiency coefficient (a representation of the effective utilization of latent heat storage capacity) and effectiveness coefficient (a representation of improvement of indoor thermal comfort). A series of parameters which influence the efficiency coefficient and effectiveness coefficient are identified and then formulated to quantify those coefficients for optimal design. With the performance indicators defined, a case study is performed in a typical standard Australian residential house to derive the optimized design of PCM refurbishment utilizing the developed performance indicators. Results reveal that the performance indicators are effective in the selection of optimum PCM configurations so that the resultant PCM storage efficiency and indoor thermal comfort are optimized. This is particularly demonstrated by the significant enhancement of storage efficiency and effectiveness of optimized PCM compared to non-optimized cases for each climate conditions. Furthermore, an optimized PCM condition is found to be more cost-effective than the non-optimized conditions. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available