4.8 Article

Chemical pancreatectomy treats chronic pancreatitis while preserving endocrine function in preclinical models

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 131, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI143301

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01DK120698]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a new potential therapy for patients with chronic pancreatitis by injecting acetic acid in experimental animals, effectively reducing chronic inflammation and pain, improving glucose tolerance and insulin secretion. It shows the potential of treating chronic pancreatitis in a nonsurgical way.
Chronic pancreatitis affects over 250,000 people in the US and millions worldwide. It is associated with chronic debilitating pain, pancreatic exocrine failure, and high risk of pancreatic cancer and usually progresses to diabetes. Treatment options are limited and ineffective. We developed a new potential therapy, wherein a pancreatic ductal infusion of 1%-2% acetic acid in mice and nonhuman primates resulted in a nonregenerative, near-complete ablation of the exocrine pancreas, with complete preservation of the islets. Pancreatic ductal infusion of acetic acid in a mouse model of chronic pancreatitis led to resolution of chronic inflammation and pancreatitis-associated pain. Furthermore, acetic acid-treated animals showed improved glucose tolerance and insulin secretion. The loss of exocrine tissue in this procedure would not typically require further management in patients with chronic pancreatitis because they usually have pancreatic exocrine failure requiring dietary enzyme supplements. Thus, this procedure, which should be readily translatable to humans through an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), may offer a potential innovative nonsurgical therapy for chronic pancreatitis that relieves pain and prevents the progression of pancreatic diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available