4.7 Article

Stratospheric and Tropospheric Flux Contributions to the Polar Cap Energy Budgets

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 34, Issue 11, Pages 4261-4278

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0722.1

Keywords

Arctic; Atmospheric circulation; Energy transport; Stratosphere-troposphere coupling; Energy budget; balance; Interannual variability

Funding

  1. NSF [AGS-1547814, AGS-1455071]
  2. NSF Antarctic Program [PLR 1643436]
  3. NOAA MAPP [A127135]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examines the vertical structure of moist static energy flux into polar regions using NASA-MERRA-2 reanalysis data from 1980 to 2016. It finds a bimodal distribution of climatological flux in the middle to lower troposphere and middle to upper stratosphere, with a near-zero flux at the tropopause. Especially at 70 degrees N, the contribution of F-strat to F-wall is significant during winter, impacting the variability of F-wall.
The flux of moist static energy into the polar regions plays a key role in the energy budget and climate of the polar regions. While usually studied from a vertically integrated perspective (F-wall), this analysis examines its vertical structure, using the NASA-MERRA-2 reanalysis to compute climatological and anomalous fluxes of sensible, latent, and potential energy across 70 degrees N and 65 degrees S for the period 1980-2016. The vertical structure of the climatological flux is bimodal, with peaks in the middle to lower troposphere and middle to upper stratosphere. The near-zero flux at the tropopause defines the boundary between stratospheric (F-strat) and tropospheric (F-trop) contributions to F-wall. Especially at 70 degrees N, F-strat is found to be important to the climatology and variability of F-wall, contributing 20.9 W m(-2) to F-wall (19% of F-wall) during the winter and explaining 23% of the variance of F-wall. During winter, an anomalous poleward increase in F-strat preceding a sudden stratospheric warming is followed by an increase in outgoing longwave radiation anomalies, with little influence on the surface energy budget of the Arctic. Conversely, a majority of the energy input by an anomalous poleward increase in F-trop goes toward warming the Arctic surface. Overall, F-trop is found to be a better metric than F-wall for evaluating the influence of atmospheric circulations on the Arctic surface climate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available