4.7 Article

Comparative sustainability assessments for integrated cassava starch wastes biore fi neries

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 290, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125171

Keywords

Bioethanol; Environmental impacts; biorefineries; Integrated cassava starch wastes; Life cycle sustainability assessments; Succinic acid

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation's Southern African Systems Analysis Centre-NRF-SASAC (South Africa)
  2. British Council's Newton Fund (South Africa)
  3. Process Engineering Department-Stellenbosch University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sustainable development in cassava starch industries is hindered by high costs and environmental burdens associated with conventional waste management strategies. Converting wastes into high-value bio-products can enhance economic exploitation and reduce environmental burdens.
Sustainable development in cassava starch industries is hampered by high cost and environmental burdens associated with the business-as-usual (BAU) waste management strategies. In BAU, starch wastewater & bagasse wastes are anaerobically digested to produce biogas for starch drying with the digestate getting disposed into watercourses while the cassava stalks are burnt. Converting the wastes into high-value bio-products in an integrated cassava wastes biorefinery (CWB) could enhance the economic exploitation while reducing the environmental burdens of the wastes. Five simulated CWBs and the BAUhave been assessed and compared using simulations in SimaPro and a percentage sustainability index (PSI) estimation tool to identify product integration schemes that support the development of sustainable CWBs. The CWB scenarios included (I) combined heat & power, with (II) hexosebioethanol, (III) pentose & hexose-bioethanol, (IV) pentose-bioethanol + glucose syrup, and (V) pentosebioethanol + succinic acid. The environmental impacts generally increased with the number of product integrations within the biorefinery gate boundaries. However, accounting for avoided emissions from the corresponding fossil-products, the CWBs show higher emission savings than the BAU. The PSIs for the CWBs show that scenarios (I)-(II) favour the economic dimension over the environment dimension and vice versa for scenarios (III)-(V) and the BAU. Based on the substantial net power (-148-363 kW h/1 t feedstock) and fossil emission reduction potentials, implementation of green power tariffs could enhance the economic dimension for near-term applications of the CWBs. Thus, the CWBs should be explored for their potential to enhance sustainable industrial developments in cassava starch industries. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available