4.7 Article

The asymmetric effect of public private partnership investment on transport CO2 emission in China: Evidence from quantile ARDL approach

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 288, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125282

Keywords

Public private partnership investment in transport; Transport CO2 emissions; Urbanization; Renewable energy consumption; Quantile ARDL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transportation infrastructure plays a crucial role in economic development and climate change, highlighting the importance of transforming investments into climate-resilient, low-carbon transportation choices for sustainability. China needs policy realignment under the New-style Urbanization strategy, incorporating public-private partnerships and increasing renewable energy consumption to reduce transport-induced carbon emissions.
Transportation infrastructure is a pillar of economic development as well as a main contributor to climate change. Therefore, it is necessary to transform the transport sector investment into climate-resilient, low-carbon transportation choices in order to achieve sustainable transportation infrastructure. In case of China, this transformation might be necessary from the perspective of the New-style Urbanization strategy, and for fulfilling this strategy, policy realignment is required. To address this policy-level void in the literature, we explore the influence of public private partnerships investment in transport sector, renewable energy consumption, urbanization on transport-induced carbon emissions in China. For this purpose, we apply Quantile Autoregressive Distributed Lagged (QARDL) method during 1990Q1-2018Q4. Based on the results of the study, a multipronged sustainable development goal (SDG) framework has been suggested, under which SDG 11, SDG 13, and SDG 8 are addressed, while using SDG 17 as a vehicle. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available