4.7 Article

Eco-friendly treatment of coal gangue for its utilization as supplementary cementitious materials

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 285, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124834

Keywords

Mechanical activation; Coal gangue; Low carbon; Reactivity; Compressive strength

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51774066]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project [2017YFC1503105, 2019YFC1907201]
  3. Innovation Program for College Students, Northeastern University [200060]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N2001024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The wet-grinding treatment significantly modifies the structure of coal gangue, increasing its reactivity as SCMs. Using wet-ground coal gangue as SCMs accelerates the setting and compressive strength development of the composite materials, with lower porosity in the matrix. The compressive strength of CG/OPC composites can increase by around 71% when using CG12 as SCMs.
Using coal gangue (CG) as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) is believed to be one of the effective strategies for CG disposal. While the low reactivity of CG restricts its large-scale applications. To increase the reactivity of CG, wet-grinding treatment was conducted in this work. X-Ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were used to characterize the milled CG. The results indicated that wet-grinding could significantly modify the CG structure, contributing to it reactivity increase when using as SCMs. Using the CG after wet-grinding as SCMs significantly accelerated the composites setting and compressive strength development, with the matrix of lower porosity. The compressive strength of CG/OPC composites increased by around 71% using CG12 as SCMs. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available