4.6 Article

Electrokinetic identification of ribonucleotide monophosphates (rNMPs) using thermoplastic nanochannels

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1638, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.461892

Keywords

Nanofluidics; electrophoresis; ribonucleotides; thermoplastics

Funding

  1. NIH [NIBIB: P41 EB020594, NCI: P30 CA168524, P20 GM130423, P20 GM103638]
  2. National Science Foundation [1507577]
  3. Chemical Biology of Infectious Disease CoBRE (CBID), National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [P20GM113117]
  4. Center for Molecular Analysis of Disease Pathways (CMADP) National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [P20GM103638]
  5. Division Of Chemistry
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1507577] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanofluidics has shown promising applications in nucleic acid analysis, allowing for high-resolution free solution electrophoretic analysis. The use of thermoplastic nanochannels for the electrokinetic analysis of ribonucleotide monophosphates (rNMPs) has demonstrated efficient separation and identification of rNMPs, enabling the development of a new single-molecule sequencing platform.
With advances in the design and fabrication of nanofluidic devices during the last decade, there have been a few reports on nucleic acid analysis using nanoscale electrophoresis. The attractive nature of nanofluidics is the unique phenomena associated with this length scale that are not observed using microchip electrophoresis. Many of these effects are surface-related and include electrostatics, surface roughness, van der Waals interactions, hydrogen bonding, and the electric double layer. The majority of reports related to nanoscale electrophoresis have utilized glass-based devices, which are not suitable for broad dissemination into the separation community because of the sophisticated, time consuming, and high-cost fabrication methods required to produce the relevant devices. In this study, we report the use of thermoplastic nanochannels (110 nm x 110 nm, depth x width) for the free solution electrokinetic analysis of ribonucleotide monophosphates (rNMPs). Thermoplastic devices with micro- and nanofluidic networks were fabricated using nanoimprint lithography (NIL) with the structures enclosed via thermal fusion bonding of a cover plate to the fluidic substrate. Unique to this report is that we fabricated devices in cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) that was thermally fusion bonded to a COC cover plate. Results using COC/COC devices were compared to poly(methyl methacrylate), PMMA, devices with a COC cover plate. Our results indicated that at pH = 7.9, the electrophoresis in free solution resulted in an average resolution of the rNMPs >4 (COC/COC device range = 1.94 - 8.88; PMMA/COC device range = 1.4 - 7.8) with some of the rNMPs showing field-dependent electrophoretic mobilities. Baseline separation of the rNMPs was not possible using PMMA- or COC-based microchip electrophoresis. We also found that COC/COC devices could be assembled and UV/O-3 activated after device assembly with the dose of the UV/O-3 affecting the magnitude of the electroosmotic flow, EOF. In addition, the bond strength between the substrate and cover plate of unmodified COC/COC devices was higher compared to PMMA/COC devices. The large differences in the electrophoretic mobilities of the rNMPs afforded by nanoscale electrophoresis will enable a new single-molecule sequencing platform we envision, which uses molecular-dependent electrophoretic mobilities to identify the constituent rNMPs generated from an intact RNA molecule using a processive exonuclease. With optimized nanoscale electrophoresis, the rNMPs could be identified via mobility matching at an accuracy >99% in both COC/COC and PMMA/COC devices. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available