4.5 Article

Hands-On Model of the Principle of Isotope Dilution Analysis for Use in an Interactive Teaching and Learning Classroom Exercise

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages 1208-1220

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01021

Keywords

Upper-Division Undergraduate; Analytical Chemistry; Hands-On Learning/Manipulatives; Nuclear/Radiochemistry; Isotopes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study presents a simple hands-on model for isotope dilution analysis (IDA) using beads to represent analyte atoms, which can mimic phase separation and detect results based on bead color. Three IDA methods were illustrated using this model, showing methodological differences without the need for expensive radioisotopes or irradiation facilities. The model was also demonstrated as a tool for engaging students in meta-modeling activities.
A simple hands-on model for illustrating the concept of isotope dilution analysis (IDA) has been devised. The model consists of two sets of beads of different sizes, with one set representing atoms of the analyte and the other set representing solvent water molecules. Phase separation is mimicked by sieving the beads, and the results are detected according to the color of the analyte beads. In this paper, the following three IDA methods are illustrated using the model: (1) direct IDA, (2) substoichiometric IDA, and (3) IDA-assisted neutron activation analysis. The model was demonstrated for a small group of graduate students with previous knowledge of nuclear chemistry, and the response from an inquiry held after the demonstration was good. It is suggested that the model can be used in a dry chemistry laboratory exercise to demonstrate the methodological differences between the different IDA methods, without the need for costly radioisotopes or irradiation facilities. It can also be used as a tool for engaging students in meta-modeling activities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available