4.2 Article

High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation compared with a conventional approach: Outcomes and reconnection patterns

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 1219-1228

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jce.14989

Keywords

atrial fibrillation ablation; high‐ power short‐ duration ablation; pulmonary vein reconnection patterns

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared HPSD AF ablation with LPLD ablation in terms of 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia, procedural times, and PV reconnection patterns, showing similar freedom rates but shorter procedure times and a higher rate of right carinal reconnections in the HPSD group during redo procedures.
Background The effectiveness, safety, and pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns of point-by-point high-power, short-duration (HPSD) ablation relative to conventional force-time integral (FTI)-guided strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are unknown. Objectives To compare 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia (AA), complication rates, procedural times, and PV reconnection patterns with HPSD AF AF ablation versus an FTI-guided low-power, long-duration (LPLD) strategy. Methods We compared consecutive patients undergoing a first ablation procedure for paroxysmal or persistent AF. The HPSD protocol utilized a power of 50 W and durations of 6-8 s posteriorly and 8-10 s anteriorly. The LPLD protocol was FTI-guided with a power of <= 25 W posteriorly (FTI >= 300g center dot s) and <= 35 W anteriorly (FTI >= 400g center dot s). Results In total, 214 patients were prospectively included (107 HPSD, 107 LPLD). Freedom from AA at 1 year was achieved in 79% in the HPSD group versus 73% in the LPLD group (p = .339; adjusted hazard ratio with HPSD, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.23; p < .004 for non-inferiority). Procedure duration was shorter in the HPSD group (229 +/- 60 vs. 309 +/- 77 min; p < .005). Patients undergoing repeat ablation had a higher propensity for reconnection at the right PV carina in the HPSD group compared with the LPLD group (14/30 = 46.7% vs. 7/34 = 20.6%; p = .035). There were no differences in complication rates. Conclusion HPSD AF ablation resulted in similar freedom from AAs at 1 year, shorter procedure times, and a similar safety profile when compared with an LPLD ablation strategy. Patients undergoing HPSD ablation required more applications at the right carina to achieve isolation, and had a significantly higher rate of right carinal reconnections at redo procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available