4.4 Article

A novel embryo quality scoring system to compare groups of embryos at different developmental stages

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 1123-1132

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02117-0

Keywords

Embryo quality assessment; Embryo quality scoring; Numerical score; Embryo quality comparison

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By analyzing the clinical results of 1610 single embryo transfers, we designed a new embryo quality scoring system to compare the quality of embryos at different developmental stages, confirming that mean EQS assessed at different stages within the same group were similar and that patients with pregnancy favorable factors in group A had significantly higher mean EQS on day 3 and day 5 compared to group B.
Purpose To construct a new embryonic quality scoring system to compare groups of embryos at different developmental stages. Methods Based on a hypothesis that the implantation potential of any embryo in an ovum pickup (OPU) cycle remains the same at any stage of development, be it day 2, 3, or 5, a new embryo quality scoring (EQS) system was designed. It was based on the analysis of the clinical results of 1610 single embryo transfers. We validated this scoring system in the comparison of embryonic quality between groups by evaluating the mean scores calculated at day 2, day 3, and day 5 for 957 embryos (150 cycles) from 3 different groups. We then compared EQSs of patients with pregnancy favorable factors (group A) such as young age and high AMH levels, with the patients with contra features (group B). Results We confirmed that each mean EQS assessed at different stages of embryonic development within the same group was similar. The mean EQSs on day 3 and day 5 in group A were significantly higher than the mean EQSs on days 2, 3, and 5 in group B. Conclusion The novel EQS system proposed by us enables embryonic quality comparison between groups of embryos at different developmental stages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available