4.6 Article

Lithospheric structures beneath the western Mongolian Plateau: Insight from S wave receiver function

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 212, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2021.104733

Keywords

Mongolian Plateau; S wave receiver function; LAB; MLD; Delamination

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [41203011, 41674044]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016B07814, 2018B02714]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Mongolian Plateau in the western segment of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt was affected by the India-Asian collision, resulting in the formation of the Hangay Dome. Research findings suggest that the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary is shallower beneath the western Mongolian Plateau compared to the North China Craton and Siberian Craton, with a possible deeper boundary beneath the Hangay Dome indicating lithospheric delamination. This led to the conclusion that the tectonic uplift of the Hangay Dome was caused by consequential asthenospheric upwelling.
The Mongolian Plateau is located in the western segment of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. In the Cenozoic, the western plateau was affected by the India-Asian collision; the Hangay Dome of a low-relief plateau has been formed. However, the mechanism of the uplift of the plateau and particularly the Hangay Dome is debated. In this study, we image the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB) with S wave receiver functions. The LAB is much shallower beneath the western Mongolian Plateau (-80?90 km) than beneath the North China Craton (-150 km) and Siberian Craton (-180 km). We also found another possible deep LAB at 200?250 km depths beneath the Hangay Dome, indicating a lithospheric delamination beneath western Mongolia. Thus we conclude that the consequential asthenospheric upwelling caused the tectonic uplift of the Hangay Dome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available