4.6 Article

Periprosthetic Femur Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does the Mode of Failure Correlate With Classification?

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 2597-2602

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.048

Keywords

fragility fracture; complications after THA; revision THA; nonunion after periprosthetic femur fracture; periprosthetic joint infection

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 2-year cumulative probability of any reoperation after surgical treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures was 19%. The most common indication for reoperation in cases with a stable femoral component was nonunion, while in cases with an unstable femoral component it was infection. Fractures originating at the distal aspect of the femoral component were associated with a high risk of nonunion and reoperation.
Background: Periprosthetic femur fracture is one of the most common indications for reoperation after total hip arthroplasty. Our objectives were to evaluate the incidence of reoperation after the surgical treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures and to compare the mechanisms of failure between fractures around a stable femoral component and those with an unstable femoral component. Methods: We identified a consecutive series of 196 surgically treated periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty between 2008 and 2017. Mean age was 72 years (range, 29-96 years), and 108 (55%) were women. The femoral component was unstable in 127 cases (65%) and stable in the remaining 69 cases (35%). Mean follow-up was 2 years. Results: The 2-year cumulative probability of any reoperation was 19%. The most common indication for reoperation among the cases with a stable femoral component was nonunion, and the most common indication for reoperation among the cases with an unstable femoral component was infection. Fractures that originated at the distal aspect of the femoral component were associated with a high risk of nonunion (6 of 28 cases, P<.01) and reoperation (9 of 28 cases, P=.03). Conclusion: Surgeons should take measures to mitigate the failure modes that are distinct based on fracture type. The high infection rate after surgical management of B-2 fracture suggests that additional antiseptic precautions may be warranted. For B-1 fractures, particularly those originating near the distal aspect of the femoral component, augmenting fixation with orthogonal plating, spanning the entire femur, or revising the stem in cases of poor proximal bone should be considered. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available